- Fukushima Nuclear Accident – a simple and accurate explanation
Has a good explanation of the reactor design and operation, with multiple update links - Explainer: What Went Wrong in Japan's Nuclear Reactors
Thursday's update to an ongoing series by IEEE Spectrum - Japan Earthquake and Reactors in That Region
Ongoing information from the Nuclear Energy Institute
After such a shutdown there is continued production of decay heat at a much lower level, but this heat must be removed to prevent core damage. For a reactor operated at steady power for an extended period, the decay heat production is initially as high as 6.5% of the reactor's initial operating power. After one hour the decay heat drops to about 1.5% of the initial operating power. Decay heat decreases with time, as described in the article linked above. After one year the decay heat from spent fuel generates about 10 kW of heat per metric ton (of fuel).
The crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi plant was intensified by the inability to reestablish full electrical power to operate the cooling systems for decay heat removal. A very concise likely timeline of events is presented in this article.
I suggest consulting the above referenced sources for further updates as the efforts continue to gain the upper hand in controlling the decay heat following unprecedented forces of nature.
Let us also focus on the much broader human suffering that is the direct result of the earthquake and tsunami.
The earthquake, tsunami and the nuclear reactor accidents in Japan will undoubtly
ReplyDeleteraise the level of awareness of the consquences of building nuclear power plants on or near faultlines located on the tectonic plates.
Jimmy Mahuron K9JWJ
The main stream media may refer to the reactor plant damage at Fukushima as nuclear accidents, but this is NOT appropriate. The Three Mile Island and Chernobyl reactors represent nuclear accidents. The damage in Japan was a 2-punch act of nature. The plants were designed to survive a certain level of earthquake and tsunami activity, though not of the magnitude and coincidence experienced in this event.
ReplyDelete